Handbook on Peace Agreement Draft Language

Security Sector Reform (SSR) 

Chapter [10]: Security Sector Reform (SSR)

Introductory Notes

Security Sector Reform (SSR) is a critical component of post-conflict transformation that focuses on reforming security institutions to operate effectively, professionally, and with respect for human rights under democratic civilian control. While closely related to other peace processes like DDR and vetting, SSR specifically addresses the transformation of security institutions themselves—including the military, police, intelligence services, border security, and related oversight bodies—to prevent future abuses and ensure they serve all citizens effectively and fairly.

Why Include This Chapter

  • Define clear principles and frameworks for transforming security institutions;
  • Create mechanisms for civilian oversight and democratic control;
  • Establish standards for professional conduct and accountability;
  • Set parameters for size, structure and composition of reformed security forces;
  • Outline processes for vetting and training security personnel;
  • Create timelines and benchmarks for implementing reforms;
  • Specify coordination mechanisms between different security institutions.

SSR Overview

The goal of SSR in a peace process is to transform security institutions that may have been involved in past abuses or operated without proper oversight into professional services that protect all citizens and uphold the rule of law. SSR may serve to:

  • Establish Democratic Control: Creates mechanisms for civilian oversight and democratic control of security institutions, ensuring transparency and accountability.
  • Professionalize Security Forces: Develops professional, well-trained security forces that respect human rights and operate according to international standards.
  • Build Public Trust: Reforms to security institutions restore public confidence by ensuring that they serve and protect all citizens fairly and effectively.
  • Prevent Future Abuses: Establishes safeguards and oversight mechanisms to prevent security forces from engaging in human rights violations or other abuses of power.
  • Support Peace: Prevents security forces from becoming sources of renewed conflict by addressing structural issues that may have contributed to past violence.

While SSR intersects with other elements of a peace process such as DDR, vetting, and accountability mechanisms, it requires specific attention in peace agreements because it addresses the fundamental transformation of security institutions themselves. This transformation is crucial for preventing future conflicts and ensuring sustainable peace. When negotiating SSR provisions, parties typically need to balance competing priorities: maintaining security during the transition period while simultaneously reforming the institutions responsible for that security. Parties also consider sensitive issues such as the integration of former combatants into security forces, the extent of international involvement in reforms, and mechanisms for civilian oversight.

When designing SSR provisions, parties consider several practical factors that will affect implementation. These include whether to create new security institutions or reform existing ones; how to sequence reforms across different security institutions; what role international actors will play in supporting reforms; how to balance local ownership with international standards; what resources and capacity will be required; and how to maintain security during the reform process.

Core Issues Addressed

Most peace agreements address the following core issues in a Chapter on SSR:

  • Principles and Legal Framework: This section establishes the foundational principles and legal basis for security sector reform, ensuring alignment with democratic norms and human rights standards.
    • Governing Principles: outlines the key principles that will guide SSR implementation, such as civilian oversight, professionalism, human rights compliance, and gender equality.
    • Legal Basis: establishes the constitutional and legislative framework needed to implement SSR, including necessary amendments to existing security laws.
  • Institutional Reform: This section addresses changes needed in security institutions' structures, policies, and practices.
    • Roles and Responsibilities of Forces: outlines the distinct responsibilities of the armed forces and the police.
    • Command and Control: establishes chains of command and civilian oversight mechanisms.
    • Vetting Procedures: outlines processes for screening personnel to ensure suitability for service based on human rights records and professional conduct.
    • Restructuring: commits the parties to restructuring its security forces.
    • Training and Capacity Building: describes programs to enhance professional skills, human rights awareness, and adherence to democratic principles.
  • Force Structure and Composition: This section determines the size, makeup and integration of security forces.
    • Size and Distribution: specifies the authorized strength of different security forces and their geographical deployment.
    • Integration Process: outlines procedures for integrating former combatants or members of armed groups into reformed security institutions.
    • Representation: establishes quotas or targets to ensure ethnic, regional and gender diversity within security forces.
  • Oversight and Accountability: This section creates mechanisms to ensure democratic control and accountability of security institutions.
  • Resource Management: This section addresses the financial and logistical aspects of security sector reform.
    • Budgeting Process: establishes transparent procedures for allocating and managing security sector resources.
    • Donor Coordination: creates frameworks for managing international support and assistance.
  • Implementation Timeline: This section sets out clear phases and deadlines for implementing reforms.

Principles and Legal Framework

Note to Drafters: Principles and legal framework establishes the foundational principles and legal basis for Security Sector Reform (SSR), ensuring alignment with democratic norms and human rights standards.

Draft Language:

Governing Principles

Note to Drafters: Governing principles allows parties to outline a clear understanding of what will guide the SSR process. The governing principles provide a high level perspective on the goals of the SSR process.

Governing Principles
The following principles shall guide the implementation of Security Sector Reform:

Civilian Oversight:  Security institutions must operate under civilian control to ensure accountability and transparency.

Professionalism:  Security forces shall maintain high standards of conduct, integrity, and service.

Human Rights Compliance:  All security operations must adhere to international and domestic human rights standards.

Gender Equality and Inclusivity:  Efforts will be made to ensure the meaningful participation of all vulnerable and marginalized groups in all aspects of security sector roles. This includes establishing mechanisms for their involvement in security governance, decision-making processes, policy formulation, and operational planning.

Institutional Reform

Note to Drafters: In certain instances, substantial restructuring of forces may be necessary to integrate dismantled irregular forces or prevent the continuation of human rights abuses. Parties may request the support of the international community to ensure that the restructuring follows best practices and establish interim law enforcement units to prevent law enforcement vacuums.

Draft Language:

Roles and Responsibilities of Forces

Note to Drafters: In certain conflicts, the role of the police and military become blurred during the fighting and the military begins being deployed for law enforcement purposes. For this reason, parties may confirm the role of the police forces and the armed forces in a peace agreement.

Roles and Responsibilities of Forces
The Armed Forces of [state] shall not be used for law enforcement purposes and shall not be deployed in response to domestic unrest[, except [as defined by the Constitution] / [when necessary for reasons of national emergency]]. [When deployed to respond to a national emergency, all action by the Armed Forces shall be limited to the period and extent strictly necessary to restore order and shall cease once that task has been fulfilled.]

All law enforcement functions shall be [exclusively] performed by [police forces [and gendarmerie]].

The Armed Forces shall have as their primary purpose the defense of the sovereignty, independence, and integrity of the national territory and of the constitutional order.

Armed Forces and Police Forces shall be independent and serve to maintain peace, order, and public safety. 

The activities of the state Intelligence Agency[ies] shall be restricted to compiling and analysing information in the general interest, by the means and within the limits authorized by the legal order and, in particular, on the basis of strict respect for human rights.
Draft Language:

Command and Control

Note to Drafters: Clear command and control structures provide for effective governance of security institutions and creates predictability in decision making.

Option 1: Overall Civilian Command
The Parties agree that all security forces shall operate under a unified chain of command, accountable to the civilian government. The head of state shall serve as the Commander in Chief, with operational authority delegated to the [Ministry of Defense / designated institution] and relevant law enforcement agencies. All decisions on deployment and strategic operations shall require civilian approval and compliance with constitutional and human rights standards.
Option 2: Designation of Ministerial Control
The Parties agree that the Armed Forces of [state] shall be placed under the authority of the [Ministry of Defense] and the Police [and Intelligence] Forces shall fall under the authority of the [Ministry of Interior].
Draft Language:

Vetting Procedures

Note to Drafters: Vetting of the security sector preserves its integrity and enhances trust among the population.

Option 1: Independent Vetting Commission
The Parties agree to establish an Independent Vetting Commission to oversee the vetting of all security personnel. The Commission will ensure that only individuals without a history of human rights violations, including gender based violence or discrimination, are allowed to serve in the security forces. The Commission will review all candidates and provide regular reports to the public on its findings, ensuring the process upholds the principles of fairness and non discrimination.
Option 2: Public and Transparent Vetting Process
The vetting process for security personnel will be transparent, ensuring that all candidates are subject to a thorough review of their conduct, including any history of human rights abuses, discrimination, or gender based violence. The public will have the opportunity to raise concerns about any candidate’s suitability. An independent board will review these concerns, ensuring that final decisions reflect the highest standards of due process, impartiality, and respect for human rights.
Draft Language:

Restructuring

Note to Drafters: In certain instances, substantial restructuring of forces may be necessary to integrate dismantled irregular forces or prevent the continuation of human rights abuses. Parties may request the support of the international community to ensure that the restructuring follows best practices and establish interim law enforcement units to prevent law enforcement vacuums.

Restructuring
The Parties will seek the support of [international community] / [designate international organization(s)] / [United Nations] to provide advisory staff, equipment, logistics and experienced trainers for the security reform effort. 

There shall be an immediate restructuring of the [state police force], [intelligence units], [armed forces], [designate other security service]. These restructured security forces shall adopt a professional orientation that emphasizes democratic values and respect for human rights, a non partisan approach to duty and the avoidance of corrupt practices.

Until the deployment of [newly trained state police], maintenance of law and order throughout [region / state] shall be the responsibility of an interim police force. The Parties call on [name of international organization] / [United Nations] to monitor the activities of the interim police force and assist in the maintenance of law and order throughout [region / state].

[All irregular armed units and paramilitary forces not falling under the formal structures of the [state] shall be dismantled.]

The Parties shall ensure representation of women in structures of the military institution and other [security services] / [security sector] and in related decision making entities, as well as in the reform, development, and modernization of the military establishment and other [security services] / [the security sector].
Draft Language:

Training and Capacity Building

Note to Drafters: Training and capacity building programs for security personnel often focus on enhancing knowledge and skills in human rights, gender equality, and non discrimination, while promoting professionalism and accountability.

Training and Capacity Building
The Parties agree to implement comprehensive training and capacity building programs for all security personnel. These programs will focus on the following key areas:

Human Rights and Rule of Law: All personnel will receive mandatory training on international human rights standards, including the protection of vulnerable populations and the prevention of gender based violence, discrimination, and abuse.

Non Discrimination: Training will be included to promote non discrimination on all protected grounds, including gender, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, tribe, disability, age, and other status. Specific training will be included to address gender equality and the role of security forces in preventing and responding to gender based violence. Personnel will be educated on recognizing and addressing biases and prejudices to ensure a culture of respect for all individuals.

Professionalism and Accountability: Personnel will be trained to uphold the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and accountability. This includes respect for civilian oversight, adherence to national laws, and responsibility for actions taken while in service.

Community Policing and Conflict Resolution: Security personnel will be trained on community engagement and non violent conflict resolution techniques, ensuring that security forces operate as partners in rebuilding and maintaining public trust in the post conflict environment.

The Parties will seek the support of relevant international agencies to assist in the development and implementation of these training programs.

Force Structure and Composition

Note to Drafters: The allocation of security personnel and their deployment can be a factor in managing the balance of power and preventing the re emergence of any faction’s dominance. Provisions on the deployment and size of security forces are intended to ensure that no one region or group can dominate the security apparatus.

Draft Language:

Size and Distribution

Note to Drafters: The allocation of security personnel and their deployment can be a factor in managing the balance of power and preventing the re emergence of any faction’s dominance. Provisions on the deployment and size of security forces are intended to ensure that no one region or group can dominate the security apparatus.

Size and Distribution
The authorized number of personnel for each security force ([military / police / other]) will be set at [X] and will not exceed this number unless approved by the relevant authorities. Forces will be deployed in [designated regions  areas], with a focus on balancing coverage across all regions, especially areas with vulnerable or high risk populations. Adjustments to the deployment and size of forces will be made as needed, in consultation with [the civilian government and other relevant entities].
Draft Language:

Integration Process

Note to Drafters: Integration of former combatants into security forces is a practical step in post conflict security sector reform, aimed at ensuring stability and operational functionality. Addressing barriers faced by women and marginalized groups, such as limited access to training and systemic discrimination, is necessary to create a force that reflects societal diversity.

Option 1: Framework for Integration
The Parties shall establish a comprehensive framework for the integration of former combatants into the reformed security forces. This framework will include provisions for training, vetting, and support to ensure a smooth transition.

The integration process shall prioritize gender inclusivity by ensuring that women and marginalized groups are represented in all aspects of security sector roles. Specific measures shall be taken to address barriers to their participation in training programs and operational roles.
Option 2: Integration of Specific Units
The Parties agree that [designate irregular military unit(s)] shall integrate into the Armed Forces of [state].

The process of integration and unification of forces shall be [gradual] / [prompt] and completed by the end of the [transitional period].

[The Parties agree that political elements of [designate force(s)] are represented in political processes at regional and state levels.]
Draft Language:

Representation

Note to Drafters: Representation provisions in the security sector often reflect broader goals of inclusivity, equality, and national cohesion. Setting quotas or targets for women, ethnic groups, and regional balance can address historical marginalization and create a security force that reflects the diversity of the society it serves.

Option 1: Quotas for Gender and Ethnic Diversity
The security sector shall include a minimum of [X]% representation of women and [Y]% representation of ethnic minorities in all ranks and positions. These quotas shall be reviewed annually to ensure compliance and effectiveness.
Option 2: Balanced Leadership Representation
The composition of leadership in the security forces shall reflect gender diversity, with women occupying no less than [specific percentage]% of all senior and command level positions. This shall include roles in both operational and administrative capacities. Measures will be taken to support women’s advancement into these roles through targeted training, mentorship, and recruitment initiatives.
Option 3: Regional Representation
To promote regional balance within the security forces, the Parties agree to implement recruitment strategies that prioritize individuals from underrepresented regions, ensuring that no single region dominates the composition of security personnel.

Oversight and Accountability

Note to Drafters: Oversight and accountability mechanisms help ensure that security forces operate within legal and ethical boundaries and are subject to public scrutiny. Parties generally assess the capacity of institutions to implement civilian oversight, internal disciplinary systems, and external monitoring, as well the risks of political interference and resource limitations.

Draft Language:
Option 1: Civilian Oversight Institutions
A civilian oversight institution, such as a [committee / commission], shall be established to supervise and review the operations, policies, and conduct of the security forces. This institution shall be composed of representatives from diverse sectors of society, including [civil society organizations, experts, and other relevant stakeholders], and will have the authority to make recommendations, conduct investigations, and issue public reports.
Option 2: Internal Accountability
The security forces shall adopt and enforce an internal disciplinary system, including a clear code of conduct, mechanisms for reporting violations, and appropriate sanctions for misconduct. These systems will include transparent procedures to handle complaints from both personnel and the public, ensuring accountability and compliance with national and international human rights standards.
Option 3: External Monitoring
An independent oversight mechanism shall be established to monitor the activities of the security sector. This mechanism will involve [parliamentary committees, civil society organizations, and / or international partners], which will have the authority to conduct audits, publish findings, and recommend corrective actions. Public reporting will be a key element of this mechanism to ensure transparency and build public trust in the security forces.

Resource Management

Note to Drafters: Parties can set out commitments and principles governing the budgeting process for SSR in a peace agreement. These commitments can include mechanisms for public disclosure, reviews, and oversight to prevent misuse of funds.

Draft Language:

Budgeting Process

Note to Drafters: Parties can set out commitments and principles governing the budgeting process for SSR in a peace agreement. These commitments can include mechanisms for public disclosure, reviews, and oversight to prevent misuse of funds.

Budgeting Process
The Parties agree to establish a transparent budgeting process for the security sector, with clear procedures for the allocation, management, and auditing of resources.  

The legislature shall retain oversight and final approval over the allocation of funds to the security sector, ensuring alignment with national priorities and legal frameworks. All budgetary decisions shall be publicly disclosed, and an independent oversight body will review the allocation and use of resources to ensure efficiency, accountability, and compliance with financial standards. 

Regular budget reports will be submitted to [parliament, oversight bodies, and civil society] for review and evaluation.
Draft Language:

Donor Coordination

Note to Drafters: Donor coordination mechanisms ensure alignment of international assistance with national priorities and prevent duplication.

Option 1: Regular Donor Meetings Schedule
Regular donor meetings will be held every [X months] to review progress, assess emerging needs, and discuss coordination of international assistance. These meetings will include representatives from the government, international donors, and other relevant stakeholders, ensuring alignment with national security sector reform goals.
Option 2: Appointment of Liaison Officer
A dedicated liaison officer will be appointed to facilitate communication and coordination between international donors and local authorities. This officer will ensure that donor assistance is aligned with national priorities, oversee the implementation of donor funded projects, and serve as the primary point of contact for donor inquiries.
Draft Language:

Implementation Timeline

Note to Drafters: Parties can develop the implementation timeline for SSR based on different methods, such as phases, benchmarks, or periodic reviews. The timelines allow to ensure a continuous progress on the implementation of the reforms.

Option 1: Phased Implementation
The reform process shall be implemented in phases, with each phase containing specific objectives and milestones. These phases will be clearly outlined in the implementation plan, with timelines and resources allocated for each stage. Regular assessments will be conducted to ensure that each phase meets the intended outcomes before progressing to the next.
Option 2: Benchmarks and Indicators
The implementation of the reform process will be guided by measurable benchmarks and indicators to track progress. These criteria will be established for each stage of the reform, and regular reports will be provided to assess achievement against these benchmarks. Adjustments to the implementation plan will be made based on performance evaluations.
Option 3: Review Mechanisms
A review mechanism will be established to assess the progress of the implementation plan on a regular basis. These reviews will be conducted at predefined intervals, and the results will be used to adjust the implementation strategy, ensuring that reforms remain aligned with objectives and are effectively achieving desired outcomes.

Further Readings